Cross-Tenant Protection

One environment confirms a threat. Others can act on the lesson.

When a threat is validated in one environment, UnifiedONE can make the defensive lesson available to other participating environments. Each checks relevance, policy, permissions, connected controls and licences before a local response. The private investigation stays at its source.

One finding. More teams ready.

Join the Community See how it works

Create your account and start your guided onboarding.

Private case details stay local
Eligible responses can start sooner
Each tenant stays in control

The problem

A useful finding can become repeated work.

An MSP or a group may see the same attack across many environments. Without a governed way to reuse the defensive lesson, teams can repeat investigation before deciding what applies locally.

Tenant by tenantRepeated work

The same work, tenant after tenant.

Repeated investigation can delay the next local decision.

With UnifiedONEOne shared lesson

One lesson. A decision in each environment.

The lesson crosses the boundary; control does not. Each tenant's policy, permissions and licences decide its response.

How it works

One lesson crosses the boundary. Local control does not.

Choose how the lesson arrives, then compare three independent recipient decisions. Participation never means the same action runs everywhere.

Validated defensive lessonSuspected credential-phishing infrastructure

Illustrative example

What can travel

Attacker indicators
Validation and confidence
Expiry and privacy-safe pattern

What stays in the source environment

Customer and tenant identity
Users, messages and files
Raw records and investigation notes

Received as contextThe lesson and its reasoning are received. Nothing changes in a recipient environment.

Recipient environment A

Participation: Participating
Relevance: Relevant here
Local policy: Allowed for this action type
Available control: Supported control connected
Permission / licence: Required access present

Local outcomeContext received. No local change.

Recipient environment B

Participation: Participating
Relevance: Relevant here
Local policy: Approval required
Available control: Supported control connected
Permission / licence: Required access present

Local outcomeContext received. No local change.

Recipient environment C

Participation: Participating
Relevance: Relevant here
Local policy: Action type allowed
Available control: Required control unavailable
Permission / licence: Capability gap remains

Local outcomeLesson visible. The capability gap is named.

Illustrative recipients and outcomes. No customer records or live activity.

Privacy, participation and operating limits

Cross-Tenant Protection evaluates a defensive lesson for each participating environment. It does not provide tenant access or transfer the case that produced the lesson.

Privacy boundary: Attacker knowledge may travel; identities, content, files, raw records and tenant access stay local.
Evidence boundary: DCRE — Dynamic Confidence & Reputation keeps validation, contradiction, recency and expiry attached to the lesson.
Authority boundary: Participation, policy, approval, connected controls, permissions and licensing are evaluated per recipient.
Verification boundary: Provider acceptance is not observed protection. Independent assurance is a planned capability delivered in phases.

Built for your team

Investigate once. For every team.

SMBs

Use relevant validated findings from participating environments through the controls you already have.

MSPs & MSSPs

Reuse an investigation across eligible customers while each keeps its own authority.

Enterprises

Help business units act on relevant findings without flattening local policy.

SOC teams

Carry a confirmed finding into the next eligible response.

Questions

Cross-Tenant Protection, explained.

What crosses from one environment to another?

Privacy-safe defensive knowledge can travel: attacker indicators, validation, confidence, expiry and attack patterns. Customer and tenant identities, users, messages, files, raw records, investigation notes and tenant access remain local.

Does participation allow automatic action?

No. Observe changes nothing. Assist prepares an eligible response for a named approver. Act applies only to pre-approved action types and still depends on relevance, local policy, connected controls, permissions and licensing.

What happens when a recipient lacks the required control or licence?

The lesson can remain visible, but the response cannot be presented as successful protection. The missing capability or licence stays named for that recipient environment.

Can every downstream outcome be independently verified today?

No. Provider acceptance is different from an observed protection state. Continuous Protection Assurance and the Assurance Center are planned capabilities delivered in phases.

Let one defensive lesson help more than one environment.

Join the community and keep every recipient's policy, approval and controls independent.

Join the Community Explore Shared Defense Intelligence

Create your account and start your guided onboarding.